Security risk assessments, governance frameworks, and board-level reporting aligned to ISM, PSPF, and industry best practice.
Cyber Risk Dashboard
SRAs Completed
3 ASSESSMENTS
Board Report
Q2
Ready for presentation
You have multiple systems requiring SRAs but lack a consistent, repeatable process.
Executive leadership needs clear cyber risk reporting but your current data doesn't translate to business language.
ISM, PSPF, Essential Eight, NIST — you're unsure which framework to prioritise and how they interact.
SRAs aligned to your organisation's risk management processes and applicable frameworks.
Gap analysis against Information Security Manual controls relevant to your environment.
Cyber risk committee papers that translate technical findings into business-relevant language.
Prioritised recommendations with clear actions, owners, and timelines.
Policy review and governance structure development to support ongoing risk management.
You need ongoing risk management and governance that meets defence industry expectations and supports your security posture.
Your organisation requires ISM and PSPF-aligned risk assessments with governance reporting for executive committees.
You've outgrown ad-hoc security and need a structured approach to risk management, governance, and board reporting.
Federal agency
Scoped, assessed, and reported on three high-priority SRAs in a single calendar year — an enterprise integration platform, a supplier-security uplift, and a public-facing online services portal with paired penetration testing — all delivered inside the agency's assessment window.
Federal agency
Delivered executive and board-ready cyber governance papers, stood up a Foreign Ownership Control and Influence process, and supported system accreditation activities across a shared-services environment — so the agency walked into its next review with defensible answers.
Federal department
Led the department's Essential Eight maturity review using ACSC verification methodology, then ran continuous-assurance activities through annual PSPF reporting and ASD cyber survey submissions — keeping E8 posture live between formal reviews.
We align to ISM, PSPF, and client-specific risk management processes. We also map to Essential Eight and ISO 31000 where relevant.
Yes. We prepare board papers and can attend committee meetings to present findings and recommendations directly to your executive team.
Penetration testing finds technical vulnerabilities in specific systems. Risk advisory assesses your overall security posture, governance, and compliance — the strategic layer above technical testing.
Most security risk assessments run 4-8 weeks from kick-off to final report. Timelines scale with the number of systems in scope and whether we also need to build risk register tooling or governance documentation alongside.
Engagements are scoped and priced per project after initial conversation. We'll give you a firm range before you commit so there's no pricing surprise mid-engagement.
MSPs report tool output; we report risk to decision-makers. We're also defence-industry-embedded — the risk language, evidence standards, and reporting formats we produce are the ones Defence and federal reviewers expect.